Blog

Do third-party instruments harm Instagram efficiency?

For social media managers, it’s the final word city legend, handed down by means of whispers and unverified Reddit posts: Utilizing third-party scheduling instruments can tank your social engagement. Is a chill operating down your backbone, or is it simply me?

It’s straightforward to see how a rumor like this might unfold. After spending hours perfecting your content material calendar and scheduling every part by means of a instrument like Hootsuite, if you discover a publish underperforming, it’s solely pure to surprise, “Is it my content material, or the scheduling instrument’s fault?”

However is that this social media city legend truly true, or is it simply one other conspiracy concept, like shadowbanning? Just one strategy to discover out: it’s time to place this concept to the scientific check.

Does utilizing third-party scheduling instruments truly harm your efficiency on platforms like Instagram? We’re about to search out out.


Bonus!!!

Use our free engagement charge calculator to search out out your engagement charge 4 methods quick. Calculate it on a post-by-post foundation or for a whole marketing campaign — for any social community.

Speculation

Instagram posts scheduled by means of third-party instruments could have decrease attain and engagement than posts scheduled natively

Okay, this isn’t essentially our speculation, but it surely’s what the web has claimed, unsubstantiated, for years. We’re massive followers of the comfort of social media administration instruments just like the Hootsuite dashboard, so the rumor has been tough to listen to.

And look, possibly it’s not very scientific to confess, however we actually hope it’s not true.

The idea goes like this: Instagram (and different social media platforms) can inform if you’re posting by means of a third-party app and can punish you for not utilizing their native instruments by limiting how many individuals see your content material, primarily burying it within the algorithm.

If this concept is true, posts scheduled by means of exterior platforms ought to present decrease attain, impressions, and engagement (likes, feedback, shares, Story faucets, saves, and so on.) than these scheduled or posted manually inside Instagram.

As an organization that makes a scheduling instrument, it will be straightforward to only dismiss this declare. However slightly than ignore it outright, we determined to check it correctly.

Methodology

To check whether or not third-party social media scheduling instruments have an effect on efficiency, I wanted to design an experiment that may isolate this variable whereas holding every part else as constant as potential. However as a sporadic private poster, my very own account wasn’t one of the best place to check this concept.

As an alternative, I requested my husband, the owner-operator of Vancouver’s Growth Professional Wrestling, if he would please let me use his enterprise account (@boom_pro_wrestling) as a case research.

He kindly agreed. (Thanks, Max!)

In fact, this experiment makes use of a wrestling enterprise account, however we’d argue that the findings apply to any trade, from retail to nonprofits.

Right here’s how I approached it:

Week 1: Posting and scheduling utilizing Instagram

Max posted 5 feed posts (a mixture of single photographs, carousels, and Reels) and 5 Instagram Tales straight by means of Instagram.

For instance, a retail model may publish product images, whereas a nonprofit might share affect tales — our wrestling content material adopted an identical promotional combine.

Max maintained his standard content material combine (clips from exhibits, ticket sale bulletins, wrestling pictures), posting model, and hashtag technique. After posting, he recorded engagement and attain metrics for every publish.

We calculated the engagement charge for every publish because the quantity of people that favored, commented on, or shared a photograph, carousel, or Reel divided by the publish’s attain (the quantity of people that noticed it).

Week 2: Scheduling utilizing Hootsuite

For the second week of the experiment, Max used a third-party instrument (on this case, Hootsuite) to schedule 5 extra feed posts and Tales.

The kind of content material was just like what he’d posted the week earlier than, with related themes, caption lengths, hashtag counts, and similar posting instances).

In fact, we recorded all efficiency metrics once more. This was tremendous straightforward to do due to Hootsuite’s built-in analytics options, as you’ll see — and Hootsuite calculates engagement the identical method we did, which makes the comparability even cleaner.

To make the check as truthful as potential, we:

  • Used the identical Instagram account for all posts
  • Posted across the identical time on corresponding days
  • Saved caption lengths and hashtag counts constant
  • Used related visible kinds and content material themes

Outcomes

Now for the second of fact: did we see a vital distinction between content material posted natively versus content material scheduled by means of Hootsuite?

Right here’s what the information confirmed:

ENGAGEMENT RATETOTAL LIKESTOTAL COMMENTSTOTAL SHARESTOTAL REACH
Native Posts6.44%336181097,189
Scheduled Posts8.19%713377910,122

Bigger assessments are wanted to substantiate tendencies, however for now, it appears like we will put the rumors to relaxation. The numbers don’t lie: scheduled posts outperformed native posts in most metrics, together with engagement charge.

The 1.75% enhance in engagement charge for scheduled posts suggests a possible benefit, however with solely 5 posts per methodology, this distinction might not be statistically vital.

Instagram post engagement summary from March 14 to 18, highlighting three top posts by @boom_pro_wrestling based on likes (221, 218, and 104). Engagement metrics below show 5,582 total post impressions, with carousel albums generating 4,285 impressions, Stories 1,297, and Reels 0. There were 79 total post shares, with Reels accounting for 58 shares, carousel albums 21, and Stories 0.

What do the outcomes imply?

Our small-scale experiment means that third-party scheduling instruments like Hootsuite might not harm Instagram efficiency and will even supply advantages.

Our experiment confirmed that most often, scheduled posts truly outperform native posts, suggesting that the Instagram algorithm doesn’t penalize content material primarily based on which publishing methodology you utilize.

Instagram post engagement analytics from March 21 to 25, showing a total of 463 engagements and a 6.44% engagement rate. A line graph on the right visualizes post engagement over time, with a steep rise on March 25 following low engagement on previous days. Metrics appear in a dashboard layout, with filters and export options available at the top.

In fact, that is a particularly restricted pattern dimension of knowledge, and third-party scheduling instruments might have a special affect on a special social media platform… however these are experiments for one more day.

Outcomes might differ throughout platforms, instruments, or account sorts, so contemplate your distinctive context when selecting a scheduling methodology. And be at liberty to check it your self to substantiate!

For now, congratulations to all you social media managers who depend on scheduling instruments to keep up your sanity. You possibly can proceed along with your batch content material creation and posting at one of the best time — carry on keepin’ on.

Why the scheduling methodology doesn’t matter

Instagram’s algorithm is designed to indicate customers content material they’re prone to have interaction with primarily based on their previous conduct and preferences. The algorithm cares about elements like:

  • The connection between poster and viewer (how usually they work together)
  • The timeliness of the publish
  • The engagement the publish has already acquired
  • The kind of content material (picture, video, Reel, and so on.)

Fortunately, how the publish was revealed seems to don’t have any bearing on these elements. The platform is in the end searching for to indicate related, partaking content material to customers, not punish folks for utilizing time-saving instruments.

A detailed post view within a social media scheduler showing an Instagram Story published by Stacey McLachlan to the @boom_pro_wrestling account. The story preview displays a wrestling match with one wrestler lifting another in a ring under bright lights. Options to duplicate the post or view it on Instagram Business are visible.

In actual fact, Instagram’s Graph API documentation exhibits that third-party instruments can publish content material easily, with no point out of algorithmic penalties for utilizing these strategies. Our experiment helps this, suggesting that the publishing methodology doesn’t have an effect on algorithmic prioritization.

This probably applies to most third-party scheduling instruments, reminiscent of Buffer or Later, although we solely examined Hootsuite.

However why does the parable persist?

If third-party instruments don’t truly harm efficiency (and, in keeping with our research right here, may very well assist efficiency), why accomplish that many individuals consider they do? A couple of potential explanations:

  1. Correlation vs. causation. Maybe individuals who discover decrease engagement after switching to a scheduling instrument are experiencing different adjustments concurrently (like shifts in content material high quality or posting frequency).
  2. Outdated data. It’s potential that within the early days of the Instagram API, there have been limitations that affected how third-party posts carried out. These limitations (in the event that they ever existed) look like lengthy gone, however the myths reside on.
  3. Affirmation bias. When you consider one thing may harm your engagement, you’re extra prone to blame poor efficiency on that issue slightly than contemplating different variables.
  4. The character of social media algorithms. These algorithms change continually, inflicting pure fluctuations in efficiency that individuals may wrongly attribute to their scheduling instruments.

When your selection of instrument may matter

Whereas our experiment confirmed that third-party scheduling instruments don’t harm publish efficiency, there are some conditions the place your publishing methodology might probably affect engagement on social:

  1. New options. When platforms launch new options, they usually restrict entry to their API companions initially. For instance, when Instagram first launched Reels, you couldn’t publish them by way of third-party instruments. Throughout these intervals, utilizing native posting for brand new options is important. (However you’ll be able to schedule Reels on Hootsuite now, hooray!)
  2. Technical glitches. Often, API adjustments could cause non permanent points with how third-party instruments work together with social platforms. These are normally resolved rapidly however may quickly have an effect on how your content material seems.
  3. Platform-specific optimizations. Some native options (like Instagram’s “Add Yours” sticker for Tales) are solely accessible when posting straight by means of the app.

The true elements that have an effect on your social media efficiency

As an alternative of worrying about whether or not scheduling instruments are hurting your attain, give attention to these elements that truly affect efficiency:

  1. Content material high quality. Excessive-quality, related content material that resonates along with your viewers will at all times carry out higher, no matter the way it’s posted. Listed below are 40 concepts for if you’re feeling tapped out for creativity.
  2. Viewers understanding. Understanding what your followers need to see and after they’re on-line issues way over your publishing instrument. Right here’s a information to discovering your target market.
  3. Consistency. Common posting retains your viewers engaged and indicators to the algorithm that your account is energetic. Pssst: Scheduling your posts might help with that.

  1. Development consciousness: Staying on prime of platform tendencies and embracing new options can provide your content material a lift. Time to get your social listening on!
  2. Engagement along with your neighborhood: Responding to feedback and messages indicators to the algorithm that you just’re fostering significant interactions. Take this webinar to stage up your neighborhood engagement expertise.

In conclusion

After concluding my official experiment, I can confidently say that utilizing third-party scheduling instruments like Hootsuite doesn’t seem to negatively affect your Instagram efficiency. What issues most is the standard of your content material and your understanding of your viewers.

So go forward and schedule these posts! Reclaim your weekends, plan your content material prematurely, and cease worrying about whether or not the algorithm is punishing you for utilizing instruments that make your job simpler.

Increase your Instagram engagement utilizing Hootsuite. Schedule and publish posts on to Instagram, have interaction your viewers, measure efficiency, and run all of your different social media profiles — all from one easy dashboard. Strive it free at the moment.