Blog

Within the Seventies, McDonald’s was at a pivotal level in its progress, and the fast-food large sought to reinforce its model identification. To attain this, McDonald’s engaged Unimark Worldwide, a distinguished design agency, to discover a complete redesign of its packaging and signage. This collaboration aimed to create a extra cohesive and interesting visible identification for the restaurant chain.

Unimark’s Strategy

In 1973, Unimark performed in depth research of McDonald’s operations. They analyzed numerous facets of the eating places, interviewing workers, managers, and clients to assemble insights into the model’s strengths and weaknesses. One among their major focuses was on enhancing packaging and making certain that signage throughout all areas maintained a constant feel and look.

Key Findings

1. Packaging Love: Unimark found that the apple pie packaging was notably well-received by clients. This perception highlighted the potential for creating packaging that resonated with shoppers whereas additionally enhancing the general eating expertise.
2. Signage Consistency: The agency emphasised the necessity for uniformity in signage all through McDonald’s areas. They believed {that a} constant visible language would strengthen model recognition and enhance buyer navigation inside shops.
3. Model Image Utilization: A notable advice from Unimark was to rethink the location of the long-lasting McDonald’s image on trash cans. The design crew questioned whether or not it was acceptable for such a distinguished model component to be related to waste disposal, suggesting that it may dilute the model’s picture.
4. Uniform Design: Unimark additionally critiqued McDonald’s worker uniforms, stating they had been “not thrilling sufficient.” The agency proposed redesigning uniforms to replicate a extra vibrant and interesting aesthetic that may align with the energetic ambiance of McDonald’s eating places.

The Refusal of Unimark’s Redesign

Regardless of the thorough analysis and progressive proposals offered by Unimark, McDonald’s in the end determined in opposition to implementing their redesign recommendations. The refusal was doubtless influenced by a number of elements:

• Model Id: At the moment, McDonald’s had already established a robust model identification that resonated with its buyer base. Any important adjustments may danger alienating loyal clients who had been accustomed to the present feel and look.
• Operational Issues: Implementing widespread adjustments throughout 1000’s of areas would require substantial funding in new supplies, coaching for employees concerning new uniforms, and changes to current signage.
• Company Tradition: McDonald’s company tradition might have favored sustaining management over its branding selections moderately than outsourcing them to an exterior company like Unimark.

Legacy of Unimark’s Imaginative and prescient

Whereas Unimark’s redesign proposals had been in the end shelved, their insights into buyer preferences and branding methods have had lasting implications for a way fast-food chains strategy design immediately. The emphasis on cohesive branding, buyer expertise, and considerate packaging continues to affect fashionable advertising and marketing methods throughout numerous industries.On reflection, one can solely marvel how completely different McDonald’s might need regarded had they embraced Unimark’s imaginative and prescient within the Seventies. The potential for a extra unified model expertise may have set new requirements in fast-food branding—one that may nonetheless resonate immediately.

Concerning the Writer